Tadalafil entfaltet seine Wirkung über eine selektive Hemmung der PDE5, wodurch die Konzentration von cGMP im glatten Muskelgewebe stabil bleibt. Diese biochemische Modulation resultiert in einer langanhaltenden Relaxation der Gefäßwände. Der Wirkstoff wird nach oraler Einnahme effizient resorbiert, mit einer Bioverfügbarkeit von rund 80 %. Seine Halbwertszeit von bis zu 36 Stunden ist innerhalb dieser Substanzklasse außergewöhnlich. Abgebaut wird er in der Leber, hauptsächlich durch CYP3A4, mit anschließender biliärer Exkretion. Typische unerwünschte Wirkungen entstehen durch eine verstärkte Vasodilatation, etwa Kopfschmerzen oder Flush. Pharmakologisch wird cialis generika vor allem durch die verlängerte Wirkungsdauer charakterisiert.

Microsoft word - march 3 meeting_school councils_prin_minutes.doc

Central Algoma Family of Schools
Pre-Acommodation School Council/Principal Discussion - Minutes
March 3, 2011 @ CASS
Asima Vezina, Superintendent of CAFS
Stephanie Smith, Chair Thessalon School Council Jeff Mitchell, Principal Johnson Tarbutt Cindy Glover, Vice-Chair St. Joseph School Brenda Butler-McTaggert, Principal Arthur Henderson Allison Vecchio, Principal Laird Don Nadeau, Principal St. Joseph Island
Introduction
• First time the board is approaching the process in this way • Would like stakeholders to come forward with recommendations rather than being presented • Accommodation Review involves: Leaving things status quo? Looking at a different format/model (JK-8, JK-3, JK-6, 7-12, 9-12, or closure)? • Normally 1, 2 or 3 recommendations are brought forward to trustees and then looked at by all community members over the frame of one year • March – discussion with stakeholders • April/May – recommendations for board • Following April – if Central Algoma is under review then it is another full year under • One year from now (April 2012) - all information and recommendations are brought forth to trustees – generally senior administration (director, superintendents) will bring forward one recommendation at that time • Centre of discussion – what strategies, decisions should be made for the best learning environment? This always has to be at the core of our thinking • Learning is the centre but there are other factors which impact (i.e. enrolments, facility • Previous accommodation review discussions occurred 5 years ago • Other communities of ADSB have accessed over $70 million (Bawating/Sir James Dunn, FH • ADSB must prepare comprehensive business plan showing that the communities are in agreement with a common vision and showing the savings for the Ministry • Hope that this time, Central Algoma can work towards a common vision – one that is suitable for the Ministry and also sets up Central Algoma schools for next 25-50 years
Enrolment Projections / Building Status
• Enrolment projections distributed • State of School Buildings: o Thessalon: Two buildings – primary (50 years) / senior (88 years) – annex (primary) is
o Arthur Henderson: Two buildings (66 years) – prohibitive to repair – not worth
putting money into improvements – better to build o Johnson-Tarbutt: One main building (53 years old) which is prohibitive to repair – 2
portables with students, 1 resource portable, 1 French portable o St. Joseph Island: One facility (46 years) – good condition
o Laird: One facility (50 years) – prohibitive to repair – well water issues
o Echo Bay: One facility (51 years old)
o CASS: One building (38 years old)
• Buildings – usually plan for them to last 50 – 60 years • To make a business case for the Ministry – if we have a plan, Ministry has to be able to fund new schools/renovations – What is possible? What should we be looking at? • Solutions that are palatable in the future Group Discussions – These are some of the discussion points recorded by participants in meeting.
• See ‘writing’ on the wall – 7/8 at CASS make sense but issues around safety/influence • 7/8 makes ‘sense’ – more options • 7/8s to CASS • Look at CASS – 2/3 capacity – some of our 7/8s are bored – shops, science labs, facilities are here (idle) – unfortunate if we don’t utilize CASS building more • JK and high school students ride together already on buses • Combining schools is necessary and look at boundary lines • Housing middle communities in CASS building (renovate/addition) rather than building • If joined all elementary schools at a central site, 480 JK-6 students, 680 JK-8 students: Where would it be? If combining all schools is even considered • Talk about – whole idea of a building on the CASS site – what are the pros/cons? Echo Bay / Laird
• Is Iron Bridge in our catchment area? No – have to get to boundary • Echo Bay/Laird combining - more or less in the same communities • Echo Bay/Laird makes sense • Laird/Echo Bay – Laird is not in the ‘downtown’ of Bar River – well water Arthur Henderson / Johnson Tarbutt / Thessalon
• Combine Arthur Henderson/Johnson Tarbutt • Johnson-Tarbutt/Arthur Henderson – if new school was built on Arthur Henderson site, there would still be a school in Johnson-Tarbutt community – if on CASS site. There is no school in Bruce Mines • Two old buildings – Arthur Henderson (beautiful property)/Johnson-Tarbutt • Is there room to segregate Johnson-Tarbutt and Arthur Henderson at CASS to house • Close Annex at Thessalon (with 7/8s coming to CASS) General Comments
• To get education we need with resources • Transportation/busing issues – this brings forth discussion about different models JK-8? JK-6? JK-3? Distance travelling to school • In school supports are lessened if status quo – ¼ time SERT – still same amount of paperwork – combining will increase supports • Building a site at CASS – if school continues to decrease – then the school is available • Two elementary buildings, one central one? • Busing will ‘match’ the model/recommendation – it is a factor but Ministry recognizes
Pulse of Communities
• How do communities feel about some of these ideas? What if you have a public meeting what • Don’t want young students at high school • Don’t want students travelling a long way on the buses • If grade 7/8 program as CASS, will it be optional? • For the first few years – testing the waters or set in stone? Tricky conversation – if optional, staffing/organization can’t be determined until September • Being in schools where 7/8s are in the schools and the benefits – have parents see/talk to other parents who have experienced this • Students are on board – parents are concerned • Superior Heights – 5 classes of 7/8 in 7-12 model – discussion has moved from • Beginning is important – approach – concerns/issues • How is capacity determined? If 7/8s were implemented, how is program going to be set- up (safety)? Request a tour and to speak to other school councils/parents. • Take time to do it well • Central Algoma would have to be ‘officially’ placed under accommodation review – then these other research can happen (trip, etc.) • Echo Bay/Laird know that change is inevitable – look at split grades, etc. - obvious that something that has to change – different group of parents involved General Comments
• Sitting back and waiting to hear – opportunity for us to proactive in the process • Important Message – it is a benefit to be a priority of the board – not talked about for the last five years – conversation hasn’t continued • Talk about these meetings – who has been involved – summarize conversation – themes • Superior Heights (teams) - Visited several schools (rural, city) – always took two take aways from each – Areas of Focus: Safety, Student Leadership, Academic Opportunities – learn from other boards the rural component (transportation, ‘no choice’, etc.) • Bringing 7/8s to high school do not improve high school programs – how we can as a board/district to increase options for students at high school level? • Focused on solutions for declining enrolment – a lot of work on electronic means of
Next Steps / Time Frame
• 6-8 weeks: Next thing is to summarize tonight’s discussion and Asima will put together some more data to get a better sense of what it might look like based on discussion • In a couple of weeks time: meeting with all Central Algoma School Councils @ CASS • Common message by Asima • Each school council will break off into groups – put own community flavour to it – what questions do we need answered before putting forth a recommendation and going out to community • East Algoma Mayors and Reeves Council – Asima would like to get on agenda and discuss • From theses discussions, recommendations will be brought forward to the board – for Central Algoma to be officially considered ‘under review’ • Decision to have Central Algoma Area under accommodation review in April 2011

Source: http://www.adsb.on.ca/Info/html/1MEETINGMarch311/March%203%20Meeting_School%20Councils_Prin_Minutes.pdf