AWWA Government Affairs: Use of Aluminum Salts in Drinking Water Treatment (Approved April 11, 1997) To Be Published in AWWA MainStream Executive Summary
Aluminum is the world’s most abundant metal; it makes up 7.9 percent of the earth's crust by weight. Aluminum is typically found as a compound with other elements; it frequently occurs naturally in water. The use of aluminum salts in water treatment dates from the beginning of the twentieth century, when aluminum sulfate (alum) began to be used as a coagulant for color and turbidity removal. Aluminum salts used in the coagulation and sedimentation processes are an integral part of the multibarrier approach to drinking water treatment. This approach protects the public from life- threatening diseases, such as typhoid, cholera, and cryptosporidiosis. In addition, aluminum salts make drinking water more palatable by clarifying the water and removing many impurities that affect its color. Alum is the coagulant preferred by many water utility managers and operators because of industry experience with alum, as well as its effectiveness, availability, purity, and cost. On average, the amount of aluminum in drinking water is about the same as the amount of aluminum that occurs naturally in water sources. Aluminum compounds enter the body primarily by ingestion of food; in addition, inhalation and dermal exposure can contribute to the total body burden. Based on studies conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration, total dietary intake of aluminum is related to total food intake. It is estimated the average adult American consumes 20 to 40 mg of aluminum per day. Assuming concentrations of aluminum typically found in drinking water, this source contributes approximately 1 percent of total daily consumption. In contrast, 90 percent of dietary aluminum exposure comes from FDA-approved food additives found in baked goods, desserts, and cheeses. Medicines, including antacids and buffered aspirin, can contribute up to 5,000 mg of aluminum. Individuals on antacid therapy commonly consume up to 3,000 mg of aluminum per day and may do so for many years. Since the 1970’s, various groups have voiced concern that long-term exposure to aluminum in drinking water from the water treatment process may be a contributing factor in Alzheimer's disease. To date, researchers have been unable to verify or refute these claims. Research results are not sufficiently consistent or accurate to support concerns about aluminum in general or aluminum in drinking water as causal agents for Alzheimer's disease. Evidence linking aluminum with other neurological disorders is either limited or unavailable and does not justify strict regulation of aluminum levels in drinking water. Any discussion regarding aluminum-based coagulants should start with recognition of the proven and valuable role of these coagulants in protecting public health while improving the aesthetic characteristics of drinking water. Water utilities concerned with aluminum should regularly monitor and voluntarily control aluminum residual. Three ways to control aluminum in drinking water are optimizing the treatment process, reducing the usage of alum with coagulant aids, and using a coagulant other than alum. Background
The use of aluminum salts in drinking water treatment goes back several centuries, when it was used to clari~ water drawn from muddy rivers and streams. Large-scale commercial use of aluminum salts dates from the beginning of the twentieth century, when aluminum sulfate (alum) began to be used as a coagulant for color and turbidity removal. Aluminum salts used in the coagulation and sedimentation processes are an integral part of the multibarrier approach to drinking water treatment. This approach protects the public from life-threatening diseases, such as typhoid, cholera, and cryptosporidiosis. In addition, aluminum salts make drinking water more palatable by clarifying the water and removing many impurities that affect its color. Alum is the coagulant preferred by many water utility managers and operators because of industry experience with alum as well as its effectiveness, availability, purity, and cost. Since the 1970’s, various groups have voiced concern that longterm exposure to aluminum in drinking water from the water treatment process may be a contributing factor or cause in Alzheimer's disease. To date, researchers have been unable to verify or refute these claims. Because no clear link between aluminum in drinking water and neurological disease has been proved, aluminum is regulated for aesthetic reasons only. Because of uncertainties about its health effects and for aesthetic reasons, many water providers monitor the amount of aluminum in finished drinking water and take steps to control it. Aluminum Exposure
Aluminum is the world’s most abundant metal; it makes up 7.9 percent of the earths crust by weight. Aluminum is typically found in a compound with other elements; it frequently occurs naturally in water. On average, the amount of aluminum in drinking water is about the same as the amount of aluminum that occurs naturally in water sources. Aluminum compounds enter the body primarily by ingestion of food; in addition, inhalation and dermal exposure can contribute to the total body burden. Based on studies conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration, total dietary intake of aluminum is related to total food intake. It is estimated the average adult American consumes 20 to 40 mg of aluminum per day. Assuming concentrations of aluminum typically found in drinking water, this source contributes approximately 1 percent of total daily consumption. In contrast, 90 percent of dietary aluminum exposure comes from FDA-approved food additives found in baked goods, desserts, and cheeses. Medicines, including antacids and buffered aspirin, can contribute up to 5,000 mg of aluminum. Individuals on antacid therapy commonly consume up to 3,000 mg of aluminum per day and may do so for inany years. Bioavailability
A question repeatedly asked is: Which forms or species of aluminum are most likely to be absorbed in the digestive system and, therefore, most likely to cause an adverse health effect? Bioavailability of aluminum is influenced by several factors. In addition to aluminum chemistry, important factors include the low-pH environment of the stomach, the selective permeability of the stomach lining, the dramatic change in pH and digestive conditions between the stomach and the duodenum, and the chemical forms aluminum may take during transport across the intestinal lining and in the blood plasma.
In the digestive process, the highly acid conditions of the stomach virtually guarantee that much of the aluminum, regardless of how it is ingested, is converted to the same chemical form. As the stomach contents pass through the duodenum into the intestines, the acid content is immediately neutralized. This causes most of the aluminum to precipitate and become unavailable for uptake or absorption by the body. Mass - balance investigations verify that more than 99.9 percent of ingested aluminum is excreted through normal bowel function. What little aluminum the body absorbs is eventually excreted in the urine. Health Effects
Under certain conditions, aluminum can be part of a neurotoxic compound. The long-term accumulation of aluminum in the bloodstream, a condition frequently suffered by kidney dialysis patients, can result in severe encephalopathy, leading to dementia. Studies show that aluminum injected into the brains of animals leads to the formation of amyloid protein deposits and neurofibrillary tangles that are similar, though not identical, to those that appear in human Alzheimer’s disease. Partly because of this similarity, it has been postulated that aluminum is a contributing factor in Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, it has been suggested aluminum is a contributing factor in several other neurological disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and Down's syndrome.
To date, five major epidemiological studies have evaluated the relationship between drinking water and Alzheimer's disease. Taken as a whole, the studies offer inconclusive and contradictory results. Three of the studies report a positive association, but two establish no meaningful relationship. Weakness in design and methodology plague each study, making definitive conclusions difficult. The latter two studies, which were carried out on the largest populations, seem to be of greatest value because they gathered more accurate exposure and diagnostic information about the respective population bases than the other studies did. Overall, the results do not support a relationship between aluminum in drinking water and Alzheimer’s disease or any form of dementia. There is, however, a strong genetic component to several forms of Alzheimer's disease. In health-effects research, any systematic interpretation of data attempts to balance the evidence of causality against statistical association: Is there cause and effect or simply coincidence? The most widely accepted criteria for epidemiologic evaluation include strength of association, consistency, specificity, temporality, biological gradient, plausibility, and coherence. To establish causality, all of these criteria must be satisfied, in large part. In regard to aluminum and neurological effects, few of the criteria are satisfied by the available evidence. There is not sufficient consistency or accuracy to support concerns about aluminum in general or aluminum in drinking water as causal agents for Alzheimer's disease. Evidence linking aluminum with other neurological disorders is either limited or unavailable.
Does Aluminum Merit Regulation?
Though the role of aluminum in certain neurological disorders has not been proved, research continues in an attempt to establish a possible link. The medical, academic, and drinking water communities are conducting ongoing research about the health effects of aluminum. Future research should address the extent and strength of any link, whether the
contribution of aluminum in drinking water is a significant portion of the total bioavailable intake, and the possible beneficial effects of silicic acid or fluoride in reducing bioavailability. Strict regulation of aluminum is not warranted until a health link can be confirmed to the satisfaction of normal toxicological evaluation procedures used for demonstrably toxic contaminants. Potential Conflicts With Existing and Pending Regulations and Established Practice
Strict regulation of aluminum could adversely affect the ability of water utilities to deliver safe and aesthetically pleasing drinking water. The US Environmental Protection Agency's Lead and Copper Rule's target pH is substantially above the pH of minimum solubility for aluminum in most coagulation processes. Under such conditions, to produce a low aluminum residual in finished water, adequate settling and filtration must precede pH adjustment. The USEPA’s pending Disinfection By-Products Rule, by requiring enhanced coagulation, will prompt many water utilities to increase the amount of aluminum salts used in this process. Likewise, more stringent regulation of arsenic may necessitate the use of treatment processes in which aluminum salts are frequently cost-effective and chemically preferable. Though not required by regulation, many utilities add fluoride to drinking water. Because aluminum forms strong soluble complexes with fluoride, utilities that practice both coagulation and fluoridation must careflilly choose the point of fluoride application to avoid increasing soluble aluminum levels. In summary, existing and pending drinking water regulations, as well as established practice, require various, sometimes competing, or even incompatible chemistry objectives. Any effort to improve the quality of drinking water must consider the complex interplay of chemicals and processes. Strategies for Controlling Aluminum in Drinking Water
Although a link between aluminum in drinking water and adverse health effects has not been definitively established, many water utilities and experts in the drinking water community feel that it is prudent to regularly monitor and voluntarily control the level of aluminum in drinking water. Many water utilities do this. If the residual aluminum concentration exceeds the World Health Organization aesthetic guidelines or the USEPA secondary water quality standards, water utilities should investigate water treatment process improvements and costs for aluminum residual reduction. An aluminum concentration of less than 0.2 mg/L has long been recommended for aesthetic reasons and to minimize the color, turbidity, and postprecipitation in water distribution systems.
Three ways to control aluminum in drinking water are optimizing the treatment process, reducing the usage of alum with coagulant aids, and using a coagulant other than alum.
Optimizing the Treatment Process. Treatment plant operators control residual aluminum by controlling the dose of the coagulant, manipulating pH to encourage flocculation, and operating filters to remove turbidity effectively.
Coagulant residual monitors perform on-line chemical analyses of residual coagulant to indicate whether something is affecting the coagulant dose. Adjusting the dose is one way to reduce the amount of residual aluminum in finished water. Although coagulant residual monitors do not directly determine whether an overfeed or underfeed occurs, they do provide a useful tool for optimizing water treatment. Likewise, zeta potential (a measurement of the particle charge strength surrounding colloidal solids) is used to monitor and control the coagulant dose. Aluminum salts neutralize electric charges and thereby facilitate floc formation. Streaming-current detectors operate on line to measure the charged environment of the particle and colloid, and can also be used to adjust the coagulant dosage accordingly. Efficient flocculation is a key process in controlling residual aluminum. When added to water, aluminum salts form a hydroxide floc, Al(OH)3, which is insoluble. The speed and efficiency of this reaction is detennined partly by the pH of the water. Manipulating the water's pH to favor the formation of hydroxide floc helps to ensure that much of the aluminum will be removed in the form of floc during sedimentation and filtration.
Finally, operating filters to produce water with turbidity below the 0.1 -ntu range minimizes the amount of aluminum floc particles in finished water.
Using Coagulant Aids. In some circumstances, coagulant aids such as activated silica, polyelectrolytes, weighing agents, and absorbents can reduce alum usage. Using Other Coagulants. Aluminum salts are not the only coagulant usetul to water treatment. Iron salts are a notable alternative. Iron salts are used by about 20 percent of large water utilities and by a smaller percentage of small and medium-sized utilities. The use of iron salts has been increasing, albeit slowly, because of operational and water quality concerns associated with iron salts. Another alternative is polyaluminum chloride (PACl). Many surface water treatment plants have started to use polyaluminum chloride instead of alum. Some of the reasons for this switch are better cold-water performance by PACl, reduced sludge production, and less alkalinity consumption. On a weight basis, PACl contains less aluminum than alum, but residual aluminum is not necessarily dependent on the dosage used or the aluminum content of the coagulant. Conclusion
Concerns about a possible link between aluminum salts used in drinking water treatment to neurological disorders are not sufficiently supported by available medical and scientific evidence and do not justify strict regulation of aluminum levels in drinking water. Any discussion regarding aluminum-based coagulants should start with recognition of the proven and valuable role of these coagulants in protecting public health while improving the aesthetic characteristics of drinking water. Water utilities concerned with aluminum should regularly monitor and voluntarily control aluminum residual. About What's New Legislative Regulatory I Advisor Policies/Papers I Feedback Home 1998 American Water Works Association.
Zur Empfindlichkeit der Methode der Kupferchloridkristallisation Christine Ballivet, Haijo Knijpenga, Jean-Georges Barth, Raymond Clad The Copper chloride crystallisation in the presence of added substances is a sensitive process. The significance of its results in the different fields of application (research on food qualityand medicine, for example), is often questioned because of poor repr
The Market for Social Insecurity A shady pension reform entices economic elites and clouds the future of Sweden‘s elderly An efficient national pension system that has helped to make Swedish old folks among themost economically secure in the world has now been replaced by a costly, elaborate construc-tion which is almost certain to make the retirement years of future generations les